Short, Simple and Sweet are the Ingredients for What may Be the Best Animated Movie of the Year (4/5).
It's hard not to think about all the fears that I and many others had when this project was announced; A modern interpretation of Peanuts is just going to have poor Charles Shultz roll in his grave. The fact that Blue Sky was heading up the project didn't restore confidence either considering their last "good" movie was the original Ice Age in 2002. Rest assured however because Peanuts was everything I hoped it would be, enduring and wholesome, exactly like the classic holiday specials we see every year revived for a new generation to enjoy.
The plot for the Peanuts Movie is what you'd expect. Charlie Brown is sympathetic loser who can't catch a break no mater how hard he tries or how optimistic he can be; he's often overshadowed by his beloved dog Snoopy, whose recognition in pop culture rivals even Micky Mouse. One day a new girl moves in and Charlie Brown is love struck at first glance. The film from there plays out as Charlie Brown has to deal with his first crush all well the rest of the classic gang joins in on the action.
First, the film is deserving of my respect for focusing Charlie Brown primary instead of what could have easily been the Snoopy show featuring the Peanuts. Charlie Brown, although not the deepest character, is arguably the most likable and the premise of the movie gives plenty opportunity for his best traits to shine. Snoopy gets plenty of spotlight too, depicted by his many fantasy clashes between him as the Flying Ace and his arch nemesis the Red Baron. These were cute and well tied in at first, but by the end of the film I was almost infinitely more invested in Charlie Brown's relatable arch rather then Snoopy's make believe one. It's funny how epic the film comes across when at the end of the day its just elementary school drama featuring a plot seen in many pre-teen sitcoms.
Of course it be a sin to write this review without mentioning the cast, and yes thankfully there all here and realized into the plot. You can tell there was a lot of though put into the storyboarding to make sure each character had relevance to the story being told. The music too also deserves a thumbs up. The classic theme is here and even a couple others are in for good measure, but thats not the majority of the movies score. To my surprise the studio boldly used an original score for most of the film and even throw in a couple of modern songs too, and it works, big time! The new score feels like it could have come out of an adventure film, but also is simple and fun its its design. The score helps deliver Peanuts in a new way that feels refreshing and new without being disrespectful to its roots. Christophe Beck (who scored the film) is quickly becoming one of my favorite composures in the business after his work on Inside Out, Jurassic World and even Ant-Man. All his works so far have amplified their respective films which is the greatest compliment I can give to a composer working in the film business now.
In summation the Peanuts movie was a delight. I loved its story and the characters who have never felt fresher then ever. This is not just a kids movie, its a family movie that should be shared as such so that each generation can be touched by this film in a different way. It doesn't pander to nostalgia alone yet this is a story that I don't think will have worked as well if it wasn't Peanuts. I loved this movie and I will completely endorse it while its out.
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Monday, November 9, 2015
Spectre-Review
Bond Backtracks into the Past (3/5)
007 Latest adventures have been amongst my favorite action movies in hollywood history. Whether it be the gritty and dramatically driven Casino Royal (2006) or the stylized and cinematically bold Skyfall (2012), I haven't yet been disappointed by Sony and Craig's run with the famous character. Even Quantum of Solace had its redeeming qualities and made for a solid flick. Spectre in contrast to these three feels like the most "classic" one yet which is appropriate after Skyfall's themes of revival within the new. How does it place among this epic line up...isn't that why you have read this far...
Specter sees returning director Sam Mendes after Skyfall make his second run with the Bond franchise. Daniel Criag returns as the signature lead and this time Bond has a sleek new spy-car as he chases the mysterious Oberhauser, played by the legendary Christoff Waltz. Oberhauser aka the pale king, turns out to be the figure head of an unknown organization called Spectre and as Bond gets closer and closer he learns just how deep Spectre goes and everything that has tested him so far begins to tie together in the wake of this new and terrifying force.
The themes of Spectre play into films premise as a whole. The film opens on an incredible set peace in Mexico City, which I wont spoil here, then is followed by the classic and familiar opening theme. Writting on the Wall, preformed by Sam Smith, may go down as one of my favorite bond openings to date as the ideas of desolation and control are represented by fire and the Octopus which serves as Spectres' symbol.. Its powerful, subtle, and symbolic of Bonds struggle to come...I only wish the film could have maintained these themes.
Where Spectre starts to show cracks is within the second half of the film. I loved the first half, it's visually beautiful even though its a slow burn which I tend not to mind to often in movies. Then the love intrest is introduced and thats when I was first disconnected. For reasons I wont go into here I didn't really buy into the love story and the film really counts on that happening. Then Oberhauser re-enters the fray. Christoff Waltz is fantastic to watch, and his bond villain is everything I wanted him to be, but this movie did not need the character he portrayed. Spectre, like Skyfall, tries to walk the line between traditional and realistic; Silva worked in Skyfall because he was essentially a one man rain of terror and his motivations were understandable. Oberhauser on the other hand comes across as either a bit over the top or a little too personal; He just doesn't fit for this movie as a realistic antagonist. As much as I loved watching him he ended up being "convenient" in respect to the plot and his motivations were a bit of a strech. Maybe I'll make a post about it in the future but Ill just leave it a that here.
"Well screw that anyway! This is an action movie right, hows the action!!"you may say.........Well its good I guess.There is some fine set pieces here, at least compared to other action films out there, but this is Bond. That chase scene in Casino Royale was one of the best chases's in cinematic history and the ending to Skyfall was up there with my most memorable moments of 2012. The problem is Spectre doesn't really have any of that outside the first action scene (maybe); it makes the mistake of delivering the treats to early. If you stick around there is some great drama and mystery to be had but the action just feels uninspired past that point. There the a standard car chase, a standard gun chase, a shootout or two but nothing withstanding on its own right. It's not that there isn't anything substantial but there is a degree of disappointment and the set ups are just underwelming.
Overall Spectre can't quite make the bar of Bonds previous endeavors. Its a great film disguised as a good action movie, but its most disappointing that its potential isn't fully realized. The movie falls back on some tropes from older Bond films that just feel out of place here despite how much fun they are. As performances go Craig, Seydoux, and Waltz are preform great but they are directed to fit the mold of the characters without transcending beyond that. I really really liked it but I just couldn't love it.
......There is also a large subplot in the movie that focuses in on M and MI6. Not that I don't care and that it wasn't without its moments but this is Bond....please you don't need to spend as much time on these subplots if you just deliever Bond. Just a note for the future Sony...hopefully...
007 Latest adventures have been amongst my favorite action movies in hollywood history. Whether it be the gritty and dramatically driven Casino Royal (2006) or the stylized and cinematically bold Skyfall (2012), I haven't yet been disappointed by Sony and Craig's run with the famous character. Even Quantum of Solace had its redeeming qualities and made for a solid flick. Spectre in contrast to these three feels like the most "classic" one yet which is appropriate after Skyfall's themes of revival within the new. How does it place among this epic line up...isn't that why you have read this far...
Specter sees returning director Sam Mendes after Skyfall make his second run with the Bond franchise. Daniel Criag returns as the signature lead and this time Bond has a sleek new spy-car as he chases the mysterious Oberhauser, played by the legendary Christoff Waltz. Oberhauser aka the pale king, turns out to be the figure head of an unknown organization called Spectre and as Bond gets closer and closer he learns just how deep Spectre goes and everything that has tested him so far begins to tie together in the wake of this new and terrifying force.
The themes of Spectre play into films premise as a whole. The film opens on an incredible set peace in Mexico City, which I wont spoil here, then is followed by the classic and familiar opening theme. Writting on the Wall, preformed by Sam Smith, may go down as one of my favorite bond openings to date as the ideas of desolation and control are represented by fire and the Octopus which serves as Spectres' symbol.. Its powerful, subtle, and symbolic of Bonds struggle to come...I only wish the film could have maintained these themes.
Where Spectre starts to show cracks is within the second half of the film. I loved the first half, it's visually beautiful even though its a slow burn which I tend not to mind to often in movies. Then the love intrest is introduced and thats when I was first disconnected. For reasons I wont go into here I didn't really buy into the love story and the film really counts on that happening. Then Oberhauser re-enters the fray. Christoff Waltz is fantastic to watch, and his bond villain is everything I wanted him to be, but this movie did not need the character he portrayed. Spectre, like Skyfall, tries to walk the line between traditional and realistic; Silva worked in Skyfall because he was essentially a one man rain of terror and his motivations were understandable. Oberhauser on the other hand comes across as either a bit over the top or a little too personal; He just doesn't fit for this movie as a realistic antagonist. As much as I loved watching him he ended up being "convenient" in respect to the plot and his motivations were a bit of a strech. Maybe I'll make a post about it in the future but Ill just leave it a that here.
"Well screw that anyway! This is an action movie right, hows the action!!"you may say.........Well its good I guess.There is some fine set pieces here, at least compared to other action films out there, but this is Bond. That chase scene in Casino Royale was one of the best chases's in cinematic history and the ending to Skyfall was up there with my most memorable moments of 2012. The problem is Spectre doesn't really have any of that outside the first action scene (maybe); it makes the mistake of delivering the treats to early. If you stick around there is some great drama and mystery to be had but the action just feels uninspired past that point. There the a standard car chase, a standard gun chase, a shootout or two but nothing withstanding on its own right. It's not that there isn't anything substantial but there is a degree of disappointment and the set ups are just underwelming.
Overall Spectre can't quite make the bar of Bonds previous endeavors. Its a great film disguised as a good action movie, but its most disappointing that its potential isn't fully realized. The movie falls back on some tropes from older Bond films that just feel out of place here despite how much fun they are. As performances go Craig, Seydoux, and Waltz are preform great but they are directed to fit the mold of the characters without transcending beyond that. I really really liked it but I just couldn't love it.
......There is also a large subplot in the movie that focuses in on M and MI6. Not that I don't care and that it wasn't without its moments but this is Bond....please you don't need to spend as much time on these subplots if you just deliever Bond. Just a note for the future Sony...hopefully...
Where Does Goosebumps Go Wrong?
Goosebumps is a great script turned into an okay movie as a result of terrible direction. Its hard to be scary in a kids movie without being too scary and jump scares are just not the way to do it. I HATE JUMP SCARES. They're lazy, they're cheep and they don't scare me. They are a stupid way to freak us out for an instant but don't carry past the second they happen. Truly scary things that stick with me after the credits role are disturbing imagery and themes like the imagery of Bagool in Sinister or the themes portrayed between Ben Affleck and Rosamund Pike in Gone Girl. I understand that these things are beyond a kids movie so therefore I was hoping goosebumps would go for more of a comedy approach, sadly it fails epically with that as well. Many of the jokes are channel through the goofy best friend Champ who comes across mostly unnecessary and annoying rather then central to the plot. These are things I all blame on the director Rob Letterman who as it seems cant tell what makes a scene scary or what makes something funny. Are there scares in goosebumps? Yes a few. Are there funny moment? Well I'de be lying if I said I had a stright face through all of it. However it wasn't nearly scary of as funny as I wanted to be and the fact that it could have been there had the direction been more servicable is the greatest sin of all. Goosebumps is a 2/5 for me, I liked it but man it has issues.
Why I Hated Woodlawn
Woodlawn is a gem of an idea that muddled and suffocated by themes and morals it trying so hard to convey (or rather shove down our throats). I was raised as a catholic so I have nothing against christianity and I endorse its moral center wholeheartedly, however Woodlawn is so intent in shepherding its message it sabatoges it story to do so. Every scene where there may be dramatic conflict is followed up of another random scene showing the power of prayer or one of the other hundred christian movie cliches. The story wants to show how the team came together under the power of prayer, a respectable theme, but throughout the story we follow Tony Nathan who is the prodigy child who is always there carrying the team. The movie sacrifices both the arc of Tony and the idea of the team winning as a team, to instead utilize its message more or fall into other sport movie cliches. I felt really disgusted after seeing Woodlawn and I feel there is a great movie that could be made here, just not this movie. I cant give Woodlawn anything more then a 1/5.
What to Expect from Steve Jobs.
Steve Jobs has one of the best scrips I have scene for a drama in a long time, most certainly the best I have scene this year; The dialogue had me drooling. Fassbender also turns in an exceptional performance that for me is the front runner this year for best actor so far. Steve Jobs isn't going to be for everybody though (which speaks volumes when contrasting its box office numbers...) and its hard for me to recommend it even though I loved the shit out of it. If your curious about this flick and are craving some pure concentrated drama then check this one out because Im giving Steve Jobs a 4/5.
Is The Walk Any Good?
The Walk does everything you would expect from an early October biopic. Its a good story and has its epic character and dramatic moments. Honestly the thing that holds it back from being a great movie is just some of the choices that director Robert Zemeckis makes which is surprising considering I haven't been as turned off from his choices in the past. It didn't sabatoge the movie but I could have done with fewer audience to character narrations with Joseph Gorden Levit. 3/5 is where I stand with The Walk, its good but there's nothing here that had me enamored with it.
Thoughts on Bridge of Spies.
I really liked Bridge of Spies and my admiration for how it approaches its subject matter is only amplified by just how good of a movie it is. Good characters, great dialogue...Im sold. It also happens to be one of my closest friends favorite movie so far this year so its got that going for it too. I'll give Bridge of Spies a 4/5.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






